[HOME ] [ABOUT] [PHOTOS] [VIDEO] [BLOG] [HOUSTON] [TEXAS] [U.S. NEWS] [WORLD NEWS] [SPORTS] [POP CULTURE] [CONTACT]
Gadhafi The King of Kings crumbles - who's next in line?
Moammar Gadhafi
by Joseph Earnest August 22, 2011
Newscast Media TRIPOLI, Libya -- Over the weekend, Libya's opposition seized Tripoli and took control of Green Square in the center of the city, and the rebels reportedly captured Gadhafi's sons Seif al-Islam and al-Saadi, in Tripoli, who had arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court ICC. With his closest confidants in detention, Gadhafi's regime has finally come to an end.
Interestingly enough, it took the rebels almost six months of fighting without making much progress, yet in the past 72 hours, they were able to plow through the strongest resistance and seize the capital of Libya. There is no doubt that they got some outside help from skilled combatants who smashed through the enemy lines, then quickly withdrew and let the rebels mop up the job. We saw this happen in Ivory Coast when Gbagbo held onto power for over four months and would not surrender.
It only took 24 hours for the French, who sent a secret contingent of some of their best warriors to dislodge Gbagbo, soon after that they pulled out of the area and let the opposition topple the government. It is the same Modus Operandi that the West uses when a stubborn dictator clings to power and refuses to let go. Here's how it works: (i)The West always sends out a warning to the dictator and his family to leave the country. (ii) The dictator's assets are then frozen across the globe, and sanctions are placed upon the country. (pop-up) (iii) A last warning is then issued if the dictator stubbornly holds on to power. (iv) As a final resort, the dictator if forcefully removed militarily.
Even though Gadhafi was a dictator, it is doubtful that the main reason he was removed from power was because he was oppressing his people. There is a high likelihood that he was removed because he was not enslaved to any central bank.
Gadhafi even spoke of creating a United States of Africa with him as the King of Kings. This would have been the ultimate exhibition of freedom from the West. His country always had a surplus, therefore the international banking cartel that sets leaders up and also destroys them, did not want to have a ruler who governed independent of them. His words got him in trouble because there was a possibility that he would create an awakening in the rest of the African nations that are oblivious to the economic slavery by which they are bound. When someone or a country is debt-free, that person or country is not part of the Matrix and cannot be controlled. (pop-up)
Unlike most African dictators who are puppets and pawns to their foreign masters, Gadhafi was nobody's puppet and the ruling elite weren't too thrilled about that. The video below explains it:
Produced by Peter Joseph
In Africa, it is the way of life for rulers to seize power through violence, therefore they have to be removed through violence. African leaders who forcefully seize power never step down willingly. They always leave against their will, so don't for a second think that the poorly-armed rebels who failed to topple Gadhafi for months all of a sudden woke up three days ago with miraculous powers and captured Tripoli without outside help on the ground. Gadhafi's fall is going to have a ripple effect across Africa, and is the beginning of the end of dictatorships across the continent. There is an African proverb that says, "The big fish is caught with the big hook."
It would be a big mistake for the smaller fish to ignore this day, and continue to oppress their citizens. Add Comments>>
Related article:
Saif al-Islam Gadhafi engages public in psychological warfare
|
|
Join the Newscast Media social networks
for current events and multimedia content.
Copyright© Newscast Media. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Privacy Policy